Home |
The
Origins of Jesus Christ With the review in Part 1 in mind, let’s look at Scriptures that scholars admit suggest there was a beginning to the Son of God before His incarnation (cf. Jn 1:1 en arche, in a beginning and as in Gen 1:1). PSALM
2
The denials include the role and end purpose of the Son’s being sent. The God and Father of Jesus Christ is extremely angry that so many deny the rule of Christ in the Church though all profess to have Him in their churches. If we confess Jesus Christ in our lives, do we lie if we do not accurately represent Him?
The Father and His Son are in perfect agreement. The Father wills certain things should happen and the Son is determined that these will be done. The Father speaks prophetically to the whole world:
Surely we note that these prophetic demands of Ps 2 are in full accord with the NT! Just as we are asked to “Kiss the Son” and to trust Him, so we are asked to kiss the brethren (Rom 16:16; 1Cor 16:20; 2Cor 13:12; 1Thess 5:26; 1Pet 5:14). Godly relationships, those built on sincerity and truth, are filled with mutual trust and excellent respect. The Father trusts the Son and the Son trusts the Father. Christ trusts His Bride and the Bride trusts her Bridegroom. Do Christians trust fellow Christians?
God the Father, through His Son, has done these things. The Son descended and ascended by the Will and Power of His God and Father. The Son descended and ascended many times but once in the incarnation. As in Ps 2, one is confronted with the problem that few know the true Christ for there are many christs and many lords (1Cor 8:5). At the end, in the last days, the whole world will turn against the true Christ (Mt 24:5,24; Mk 13:6,22; Lk 21:8; Rev 19:11-19; Dan 7:21-27; 2Thess 2:3-9). It is distressing that so many apparently faithful and sincere people refuse to examine, or cannot examine these things because they fear questions about the nature of Jesus Christ. Why is that? Answers affect behaviour and status! Why are so many people afraid of questions based on Scripture? Why prefer to hold fast to dogmas learned from false shepherds and false prophets (Dt 13:1-5; Jer 23:1-40; esp. 2Tim 3:13; 2Pet 2:1-3)? Quite a number of first chapters of the NT deal with the nature of God and His Christ, e.g., Mt 1; Lk 1; Jn 1; Rom 1; Eph 1; Col 1; 2Thess 1; Rev 1; and Heb 1 which we’ll consider now.
This is also cited from 2Sam 7:14 which is a promise to David of the birth of Solomon who would build the Temple (2Sam 7:12-14). More importantly, this is a prophecy of the birth, from David’s lineage, of the Messiah, whose throne would be forever and who would build the spiritual Temple. The angels were created, and so we are left with an implication that Christ was a member of the Divine realm sent as a Son of that realm to become the only-begotten of all the sons of God (see Job 1:6; 2:1)—i.e., through the incarnation. The context of the quotation from Ps 2:7 is amplified in verses 8-9, where we have the Father speaking to Jesus Christ:
We’re left with the thought that Christ was promoted to a position of total trust by His Father.
The Father has put authority and power into His Son’s hands for He trusts Him to decide, to speak, to act and complete His Will and all that He has taught Him. God calls His Son a God (Elohim). The 24 elders about the Father’s Throne, the cherubim, seraphim, archangels, angels are the sons of God in heaven, as Job 38:7 calls the entire angelic host (all the sons of Elohim shouted for joy). Again, we note a statement of promotion of Christ by His God and Father.
Jesus had been tempted in all things, had overcome without sin, had lived in the flesh by perfect faith and was raised in rank above His companions, who quite evidently are in the angelic realm. Jesus is revealed as having God the Father as His God. Heb 1:8-9 quotes from Ps 45:6-7. It is wonderful to note more of the context which records the Father’s words about His Son.
The praise of the Father for His Son is profound. Salvation is by no other name than the Name the Father has given to His Son (Acts 4:12; 10:43; Phil 2:9; Eph 1:21; Ex 23:21).
That promise was only to Christ though Lucifer desperately lusted for it (see Is 14:12-13; Ezk 28:14-19) and such lust was typified in Cain, Ishmael, Esau.
The angels, who preceded mankind in origin, are the divine servants and protectors of those who will be transformed in the resurrection and who will rule with Jesus Christ. Envy and pride destroy those who refuse God’s omniscient and gracious purpose. It seems that Lucifer’s pride had its origins in this knowledge—that Jesus Christ was chosen and anointed for the royal and high priest role, that He would gather all the saints in the resurrection, that He, with all the resurrected saints, would be elevated higher than all in the angelic host. Zechariah, chapters 9-14, is the most quoted of the prophets in the NT Gospels. In Mt 26:31 and Mk 14:27 Jesus Christ identified the Shepherd of Zech 13:7 as being Himself.
Zechariah says that the Shepherd is the Man who is the Father’s Companion (Heb amit; LXX, polites; citizen, fellow, neighbour, associate). In Heb 1:9 (where God speaks of anointing His Son “with the oil of gladness more than Your companions”), the word for companion is metochos which means fellow, a companion who shares or partakes (see also Heb 3:1,14; 6:4). Again, we are left with the thought that Jesus Christ had pre-existence with the Father before His incarnation and was the Lamb foreordained before the creation of the universe (1Pet 1:20; 2Tim 1:9; Tit 1:2). He is the Son of the Man in whose image mankind is created (Gen 1:26-27; Col 1:15; 3:10; Heb 1:2-3). ISAIAH has wonderful things to say on the nature and origin of Jesus Christ. In the First Song of the Servant, we hear the Father speaking about His Son.
“My Elect One” or “My Chosen One” in Is 41:8-9 refers to Israel as chosen and servant as if to make allusion to Christ. Dt 7:6-11 deals with the nation as being the singular example to the nations of the world. The Father says of His Son:
The losses and desertions
I refer to are covered in examples such as the Parable of the Sower (Mt
13:1-23; Mk 4:1-21; Lk 8:1-15); Christ’s question in the context
of His return, Will I find faith on the earth? (Lk 18:8); The righteous
are scarcely saved (1Pet 4:18); and descriptions as in 2Thess 2:9-12 and
Dan 11:31-33.
Surely we cannot fail to recognize the relationship between the Father and His Son appointed as the means of salvation and the Light of God the Father to the world. The Third Song of the Servant describes Christ’s experiences and reactions to what His Father has asked Him to do. It is stunning to consider that Isaiah wrote details about Jesus’ suffering as if he knew what Jesus would say in certain situations. It’s a most unfashionable approach Isaiah had compared to many scholars who find it difficult to believe in divine inspiration by the Spirit of God (cp. Jer 2;13 and its context).
These prophetic references to Christ’s scourging and crucifixion are enlarged in Is 53:1-12 and Ps 22:6-24.
Those who do not have the Sun of Righteousness (Mal 4:2), who are not guided by the Light of this world, who do not experience the work of the Lamp of the LORD (Prov 20:27; Ps 132:17; 119:105; 18:28), create their own fires to vainly push back their darkness. This should remind us of those who create their own illusions of having the Spirit of God, about which Jeremiah speaks (Jer 2:11-13)—for they have their own sources of spiritual water. The Second Song of the Servant (Is 49:1-13) has the Son of God speaking about His origin. Scholars say this refers to His human predestination (e.g., Henri Blocher, Songs of the Servant [London: IVP, 1975], p 36).
It appears that that it was not initially known among the angelic realm that the pre-existent Christ was foreordained as the Lamb and Messiah. See our paper Satan and History for more details about the Cain-like envy and pride of Lucifer toward the future Morning Star (Rev 22:16). Similarly, the saints are not initially aware of their calling and most people do not recognize someone as called by the Father and hearing and heeding the Voice of the Good Shepherd. Let’s look at Ps 22 which uses similar language to Is 49:1. Ps 22:1-2 introduces us to the words of Christ cited in Mt 27:46 and Mk 15:34:
Jesus Christ was prophesied as being always dependant on His Father’s help. Here His words cry out His humanity and deep emotional responses to His horrendous anguish. But He did know the outcome. The crucifixion context continues:
History shows, as does prophecy, that the saints suffer many trials (Acts 14:22; Dan 11:32-35). Verses 9-10 are controversial in terms of interpretation. Let’s consider what they mean:
Is this speaking only of Christ’s birth to the virgin Mary? We should recall major poetical descriptions of birth to see if and how they might have bearing on interpretation of Ps 22:9-10. These descriptions include the following topics for consideration some of which are quite complex in that we are left wondering and may ask ourselves, What does this really mean? THE
BARREN WOMAN WHO GIVES BIRTH Is 66:7-11 has overtones to Revelation 12 which we must also consider. Those who tremble at the Word of God (66:2,5), who are hated by their brethren and are cast out (v 5; as with Cain and Abel, Ishmael and Isaac; and as prophesied in Jn 16:2; Mt 10:21-22; 24:10; Mk 13:9,12-13; Lk 21:12-17), these are the ones who have the divine hope described in:
This Child is the Lamb of God and the Messiah foreordained before the creation of the universe (1Pet 1:20; Tit 1:2). And so was the beginning of the end of the curse upon the Woman who prophetically would have birth problems and barrenness (Gen 3:15-16; Is 54:1-2). Just as Adam foreshadowed the Second Adam (Rom 5:14; 1Cor 15:21-22,45-49), so Eve foreshadowed Sarah, the symbol of the barren Woman typifying the difficulties of giving birth to and raising children of promise (Gal 4:22-31).
Readers might ask in considering Rev 12, “Is the birth of Christ limited to the prophecy of His human birth to Mary, or is the prophecy multi-faceted?” In view of other Scriptures one would think that a multi-purposed meaning is intended.
After Jesus’ death and resurrection (v 5) the Woman, i.e., the Bride of Christ, scatters but is under God’s protective care (vv 6,14). Satan’s hatred always seeks to persecute the Woman who gave birth to Christ (vv 10,12-17). Her Remnant keeps the commandments of God, bears prophetic witness of Jesus Christ in their lives, suffers (v 17; 19:10; 1Pet 2:12), and is saved. BIRTH
OF GOD’S SERVANT
Israel is Prince, Overcomer, and Ruler with El (the Almighty; God; Gen 32:28; Hos 12:4). Jacob, father of the 12 sons and father of the nation, typifies Christ who is the Prince over the Israel of God (Ex 19:4-6; Gal 6:16; 1Pet 2:5,9-10; Rev 1:6). The One who worked with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and OT Israel is the same Servant working with today’s elect. This same One was Christ, formed in the Womb, long before His incarnation which the NT Gospels and Phil 2:6-11 describe. Glorification is by God through Jesus Christ and includes the work Christ does in those who are God’s children (Is 61:3,5; Rom 8:30; 1Pet 4:11,14). There is emotional despair because the losses are so enormous. This was prophesied in the apostasy of Adam and Eve and the murder of righteous Abel by a brother whose religious beliefs and practices typify the ignominious history of most of Christianity. Is 49:6-9 gives the Father’s words with respect to the work of salvation His Son does.
It is crucial that we all understand who is speaking, who is being spoken to, and what is being said. For example, Ps 110:1 says,
Three accounts of this verse are given in the Gospels with Jesus Christ asking the religious leaders to explain who was speaking to whom (Mt 22:41-46; Mk 12:35-37; Lk 20:41-44). Since they did not know God nor the pre-existent Son of God, they could not comprehend that the Father was addressing His Son and that David knew the Son as his own Lord (Adonai) and addressed the Father as the LORD (Yahweh).
How are we cut from the Rock and from which Rock are the saints cut? In Moses’ poetic song in Dt 32, Israel is rebuked for not remembering the Rock who begot them and the God who gave birth to them (Dt 32:18). The following list of Scriptures indicate that the Rock is Christ, but may also refer to the Father: Dt 32:4,15; Ps 18:2,46; 28:1; 62:7; 78:35; 89:26; Is 8:24; Hab 1:12; Rom 9:33; 1Cor 10:4; 1Pet 2:8. However, rocks come out of a quarry.
What and where is the Pit from which the Rock and living stones are/were cut for the spiritual Temple of which Christ is the Cornerstone and Foundation Stone? The poetry of Is 51:1b alludes to the solidarity of God’s elect, and their being all of one origin and place—from the fountain of Life, from the LORD who is our Rock, and from Jesus Christ who is also our Rock of Salvation (Ps 89:26; 95:1; 1Cor 10:4). Since the firstfruits are to be formed into a spiritual Temple of living stones (1Pet 2:5), allusions to the Rock and source Pit are used figuratively (see Mt 13:9-13).
The Hebrew noun maqqebet derives from the verb naqab, which means “to bore a hole” (2Ki 12:9). The noun neqeba, derived from the same verb, refers to a female (Jer 31:22), and may also mean “to deflower.” Perhaps we see allusions and puns on words in terms of being cut out, coming out of the Womb in birth—Christ the Rock, we the living stones; Christ born of the Woman in Rev 12, the children of God born of the Woman (Rev 12; Is 54). Just as you might be struggling to fully understand, so I also try to grasp the grandeur of spiritual birth expressed in varying poetical ways: the birth of the nation of Israel, the birth of the Israel of God, the offer of birth—salvation to mankind, and the origin/birth of Christ—for He is inextricably involved in all of it. Ps 89:26-29 is messianic with overtones to the Rock of Israel in the OT and NT. In v 26 the Father is speaking of His devotion to His Son and includes the Son’s response: He shall cry to Me, ‘You are my Father, My God, and the Rock of my salvation.’ Surely we’re reminded of many similar expressions in the NT, as shown earlier in this paper.
Heb 2:13 quotes Is 8:18 where Christ speaks of what His Father has asked: “Here am I and the children whom God has given Me!” The brethren and friends of Jesus Christ are also regarded as Christ’s children. We are children of Abraham (Gal 3:7,29; 4:28,31). The apostle Paul considered himself a father to the brethren, his begotten children (see 1Cor 4:14-15). BORN
TO BE THE LAMB OF GOD—WHEN?
We know that Christ prayed for help, strength, intervention, power, wisdom. His prayers were always answered. But what about the planting of the root stock? Where and when was that? Ps 80:8-9 answers in part: The Shepherd of Israel (v 1) has brought a Vine out of Egypt, has caused it to take deep root and it filled the Land. We have a parallel in Is 11:1,10—
Ps 80:16-19 tells us what happened to the Vine of Israel and how it is saved:
The Man at the Father’s right hand was sent, was crucified, will be restored to rule on earth! Scripture reveals that the Lamb of God and the promises of grace and eternal life were given before the creation and before time began. Measurable time began when the universe began:
Since the pre-existent Christ and Servant of the Father would fulfill these prophecies, do we see the Almighty GOD, who prophesied the end from the beginning (Is 46:10; Acts 15:18)? THE
BIRTH OF WISDOM We read in Prov 8:22-36:
The NKJ translates Prov 8:22 as, The LORD “possessed” me. It may be better understood as, “The LORD created me (created in LXX, Syriac, Targum, RSV, NRSV, NEB, NJB; from the Heb qana; also purchased, recovered)” [TWOT, 2039; TDNT, III.1007]). The same word is used in Gen 14:19,22 in the title, the GOD Most High, the Possessor (or better, Creator, Purchaser, Recoverer) of heaven and earth. Qana, is used in Ps 139:13 in parallel with weave or knit:
If I accept that Christ was a creation of His Father then I’m left with the thoughts that Prov 8:22 adds to the consideration, together with other references, that the LORD in His foreknowledge took His Son from among His brethren (Ps 45:7; Heb 1:4,9; 2:6-8; Ps 8:4-6) to create the manifestation of the Father’s Wisdom, to create the universe (Heb 1:2; Eph 3:9), and then, in His omniscience and foreknowledge, to cleanse and redeem things on earth and in Heaven (Col 1:20). Prov 8 continues:
GOD’s wisdom is integral to Him, so it is without beginning. The Father purposed that His Wisdom should be revealed through an executive agent. That had a beginning. It seems evident that just as the Spirit-inspired daily conduct of the saints is not well perceived until the Day of Visitation (see 1Pet 2:12), so likewise the manifestation of the increasing wisdom of God’s Son of promise is not fully perceived until the Second Coming or beyond. We tend to be slow to see and hear. The beginnings of the calling and the beginnings of the work of the Holy Spirit in any of the begotten children of the Father are also not well perceived. Please recall how Christ’s ministry with the apostles was poorly recognized—yet He delighted the Father! It would also appear that when it became clear to Lucifer that the Son of Man would eventually reign supreme under the Father it was then that his envy and lust were aroused. Though Justin Martyr (114-165AD), one of the Catholic fathers, was already in doctrinal error so early after the death of John (about 98?), he expressed belief in Christ’s pre-existence. In his famous discourse with a Jew named Trypho, Justin said:
We continue with Prov 8:32
The apostle Paul tells us, in Col 2:3, that “in Christ are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge of God.” Oh how consistent this is with what Prov 8:22-36 reveals! THE
WOMB OF THE MORNING
Our concentration needs to focus on verse 3 with its extraordinary words—from the Womb of the morning, You have the dew of Your youth. I’ll consider a number of translations. Leopold Sabourin, S.J., in The PSALMS, Their Origin and Meaning (New York: Alba House, 1974), says verse 3 “is notably difficult, possibly because the original text is not well preserved” (p 359). He proposes another scholar’s translation:
In a short and difficult essay in the Journal of Biblical Literature (SBL; Vol 117/1, 1998; pp 93-98) William P. Brown (Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Virginia), offers this translation (p 96):
Brown admits that “In holy splendor” could be translated as “On the mountains” for that is the case in 83 Masoretic manuscripts, as well as with Symmachus [who produced a Greek version of the OT about 170AD], and Jerome [who was asked by Pope Damascus to revise the Latin versions about 382; the Vulgate was the result]. On the mountains in Ps 110:3 harmonizes with Ps 87:1 (Canticle to Zion) founded by Him on the holy mountains (from Sabourin, p 212). Brown suggests that the Womb could refer to the Temple and/or Zion which is frequently cast in material images as, e.g., in Is 66:7-9 (see p 17 of this paper); Pss 84:4; 87:4-6 (also 87:7). The dawn connotes Divine presence, as in Hos 6:3; Is 60:1-3; and Dt 33:2-The LORD came from Sinai and dawned on them (also see 2Pet 1:19; Rev 2:28; 22:16). It is nevertheless apparent that the Father reveals that He has begotten the Son. The poetical language used suggests that the birth is other than the one recorded in the Gospels through the virgin Mary. COLOSSIANS
1:15-18 Col 1:1-3 gives characteristic NT greetings:
Col 1:12-14 continues with Paul’s understanding of the relational nature in the Godhead:
Col 1:15-18 brings verses together about which scholars argue endlessly:
Raymond Brown suggests possibilities which include: “Or he [Christ] could have been a deity before he took on flesh. And even in that last possibility he could have been brought into being by God the Father as the first born of all creation (see Col 1:15), or he could have been uncreated and with the Father forever” (Christology, p 4). “Does “firstborn of all creation” similarly imply [as Phil 2:6-11 does, Brown asks] that the Son was created first and then through him others? If so, this would be a preexistence dating back to the moment of creation. I Cor 8:6 speaks of everything existing through Jesus Christ but again leaves unsettled the idea of creational or precreational preexistence” (pp 135-136). Murray J. Harris in his Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament — COLOSSIANS & PHILEMON (Eerdmans, 1991) presents specialized linguistic knowledge to interpreters. The phrase, the first-born of all creation (as in the NJB), is prototokos pases ktiseos in Greek. He says that “The “firstborn” was either the eldest child in a family or a person of preeminent rank. The use of the term to describe the Davidic king in Ps. 88:28 (LXX; =Ps. 89:27, EVV), “I will also appoint him my firstborn [prototokon], the most exalted of the kings of the earth,” indicates that it can denote supremacy in rank as well as priority in time” (p 43). Harris also comments that ktiseos means creation or creature, and pases ktiseos has the meanings every creature, every created thing, the whole of creation, all creation, supreme over all creation, or prior to all creation. And when considered with proto- the meanings may be begotten before all creation, or first(born) among all created things (pp 43-44). So Col 1:15, the firstborn of all creation, can mean that Christ was born, was begotten before the creation of the universe, and being the Son of promise, like Isaac, is firstborn of all the created beings in Heaven. The NT Greek does allow for this interpretation. Having looked at numerous sources regarding some difficult questions dealt with in this and companion papers, I continue to be surprised that many scholars, though recognizing multiple meanings in vital phrases and words, are often insistent that meaning must be limited to their ideology and other views are excluded or dismissed with flawed arguments. James D.G. Dunn in his Christology in the Making is a prime example of this. Why can’t we allow Col 1:15 to have a number of meanings without them being mutually exclusive? For example, Jesus Christ was firstborn in a family (i.e., within the Council of God; see Eph 3:15 from whom the whole family in Heaven and earth is named). He is firstborn as Isaac was firstborn in Abraham’s family (Heb 11:17-19; Gal 3:29; 4:28-31). Jesus Christ was foreknown among His companions, as was Isaac, by the omniscient Father (Heb 1:8-9; Ps 45:6-7; Heb 2:6-8; Ps 8:4-6; 2:2,7-8). This Son of God, this Son of Promise, was recognized as the One who would become supreme over all creation, for He, by the Will of His Father, created the universe, was sent as the means of redemption of the creation, and will give all, when completed, to His God and Father, as 1Cor 15:24 & 28 unmistakably say. Dunn devotes pp 187-194 to Col 1:15-20 and says: “The basic movement of thought also seems clear enough — from Christ’s (pre-existent) role in creation [He otherwise strongly denies pre-existence except perhaps in a Philonian sense] (first strophe) [i..e., the first complete thought] to his role in redemption (second strophe), from his relationship with the old creation (protology) to his relationship with the new (eschatology). But whether these first impressions are wholly accurate will depend on what our exegesis of the main clauses and concepts reveals” (p 188). He goes on to ask the question whether “‘The firstborn of all creation’ (Col 1:15b)” refers to “Christ as a creature, the first created being (cf. v. 18b; Rom. 8:29, or to describe Christ’s sovereignty over all creation (cf. Ps. 89:27)” (p 189). He then says that “most modern interpreters” have opted for “first over creation rather than first created being” (p 189). Though Jesus Christ is gathering sovereignty over all creation (for Satan is still the ruler of this world), He will give it all to His Father (1Cor 15:24,28). But do we notice that this scholar, a scribe and lawyer of the Scriptures (cp. Lk 11:44-54), admits to the simple flow of argument by Paul in Col 1:15-20? — Christ is the firstborn of all creation and is in the image of the invisible Father; all things were created through Jesus Christ (v 16; Heb 1:2); Christ is before all things, is Head of the Body, the Church; He is the beginning and firstborn from the dead (vv. 17-18); it is the Will of the Father that the fullness of the Plan of Salvation should be in Him and that He was the means of reconciliation of all things on earth and in Heaven through the blood of the cross (vv 19-20)? REVELATION
3:14
James Dunn uses the key phrase as the NKJ does. He says it “probably alludes to Prov 8.22 - ‘The Lord created me as (or in) the beginning of his way” (p 297). Of course he cannot agree that it might mean what it really says in the light of so many other biblical references. The encyclopaedic scholar and Bible translator, James Moffatt (1870-1944), believed Rev 3:14 means “the active source or principle of God’s universe or creation,” for supposedly, arche [as in Jn 1:1,2; Heb 1:10; 1Jn 1:1; Rev 22:13] is from Greek philosophy and Jewish wisdom-literature. Is it not more likely that John in using the word arche was also attacking pagan ideas associated with the word as is typical of the Jewish gnostic, Philo (see TDNT, I.479-480)? Moffatt nevertheless says: “John ascribes to him here .. that pre-existence which … has been predicated of the messiah in Jewish apocalyptic (cf. En xlviii)” (The Expositor’s Greek Testament [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, n.d.], Vol V, p 370). Some eminent scholars recognize that John and much of the NT were influenced by 1Enoch. Moffatt was aware that 1Enoch speaks consistently of the Son of Man, the Chosen One, the Messiah, the Righteous One “as a preexistent heavenly being who is resplendent and majestic, possesses all dominion, and sits on his throne of glory passing judgment upon mortal and spiritual beings” (see 1En 48 and Pseudepigrapha, Ed., James H. Charlesworth [New York: Doubleday, 1983], Vol 1, pp 8-10). The Interpreter’s Bible (Vol 12, p 396, [New York: Abingdon Press, 1957]) asks: “Does John think of Christ as Paul did when he described him to the church of Colossae as the “first-born of all creation” (Col. 1:15), through whom all things were created in heaven and on earth? Or is he using the words in an eschatological sense to designate Christ as the creator of the new age, the new creation which is to replace the old? It could be that he has both ideas in mind, for they are complementary, not mutually exclusive.” Dunn makes the passing comment: “In Revelation we may compare Rev. 3.14 with Prov. 8.22” (p 166). The Greek for “‘the beginning of the creation of God’ (3.14) [he arche tes ktiseos] probably alludes to Prov.8.22 - ‘The Lord created me as (or in) the beginning of his way … It cannot be excluded altogether that the phrase [he arche tes ktiseos] means ‘the beginning of creation’ = the first created being (cf. Gen. 49.3 [Reuben is firstborn and the beginning of God’s strength]); Deut. 21.17 [the firstborn of an unloved wife is the beginning of the father’s strength]” (Dunn, p 247). Dunn sees the possibility in Rev 3:14, but would regard it as improbable, because he is avowedly trinitarian, that Christ pre-existed His incarnation and was created by His Father. CONCLUSION
In The Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (31/1; March 1988), Larry Hellyer, in reference to Col 1:15-17, Rom 8:18-23, and Prov 8:22, says: “There [with respect to he ktisis = the creation in Rom 8:19-22] Christ is unambiguously declared to be the pre-existent mediator of all creation. As Martin observes [author of Lord and Liberty]: “If the pre-incarnate Lord was the agent of all creation, and pre-existed before everything, it leads to the conclusion that only God can satisfactorily account for Christ’s being.” (p 63). Hellyer concludes his essay with: “We thus conclude that in Col 1:15 the phrase prototokos pases ktiseos is predicated of [speaks of] the pre-existent Christ. Its thrust is to ascribe to him a primacy of status over against all of creation. This status is summarized by saying that he is God’s heir par excellence. The heirship is predicated upon [is the result of] his role in creation, preservation and teleology. Behind the predication [proclamation] lies Paul’s theological conception of Christ as the second Adam” (p 66). “The predication of Christ as firstborn in the NT offers a challenge to Christologies ancient and modern. One cannot help being impressed by the scope of this title [prototokos; firstborn]. At his incarnation (Luke 2:7) Jesus is designated as Mary’s firstborn, an appellative connoting his consecration to God and possibly his rightful claim to the Davidic throne. By his glorious resurrection, in which he was victorious over sin and death, he has become the “firstborn from among the dead” (Col 1:18) and now exercises sovereign sway over his redeemed as the “firstborn from the dead” (Rev 1:5). As the head of a new, redeemed humanity destined in the eschatological transfiguration to bear the impress of his image, he is the “firstborn among many brothers” (Rom 8:29). But the conception moves not only forward toward consummation but also, in the thought of Paul, backward into the realm of protology (Col 1:17 [He is before all things]). In Paul’s view all creation finds its reference point with respect to the “firstborn over all creation,” “the heir of all things” (Col 1:15; Heb 1:2,6). Indeed, in the eschaton Christ is the integration point for all things (Eph 1:10). A Christology that falls short of this all-encompassing affirmation does not do justice to the Scriptural data” (p 67). With the weight of evidence from earlier papers, the weight of so much Scripture in this paper, we are left with the conclusion that Jesus Christ had pre-existence within the heavenly realm as a Divine being before His incarnation and was, from the beginning, a wholeheartedly faithful Son, Servant, Lamb of His God and Father. Since Christ is not co-equal, and therefore not co-eternal with the Father, we must ask questions such as, “When, and how did the pre-incarnate Christ come to be?” The Father’s purpose for the Lamb was redemption and salvation; the timing was before the creation of the universe; and the means was incarnation for the One whom the Father chose from among the angelic host. We have considered Scriptures which many scholars recognize as indicating a beginning. There is a beginning to pre-creational existence for the Son of God. Christ had a divine pre-creational birth, then an incarnational birth, His life of overcoming, and exaltation in resurrection. This process parallels human birth, the spiritual birth in baptism and a life of overcoming, then the exaltation of the firstfruits in their resurrection as a Kingdom of priests under the High Priest of GOD to whom all worship is directed. We should see that just as the Son of God, the Son of Man, became the firstborn among many brethren (Rom 8:29), so the children in this world who are called, chosen and faithful, who have overcome as He overcame, become children of the Father through baptism and then resurrection at Christ’s return. The last days’ rumblings of a revolution in Christology and in understanding the nature of the Godhead seem to have begun. The follies of trinitarianism and binitarianism, developed as schemes to alienate man from real relationship experiences with the Almighty GOD and His Christ (Ps 2:1-3,11-12), will become universally evident and religious animosities will reach a climax that will flood across the earth (see Rev 6:9; 12:17; 20:4; Dan 11:32-39; 12:7-13)—when a deranged world government will resist the establishment of Christ’s rule on earth (Jer 25:16; 51:7; Ps 2:10-12). May the power and spiritual gifts of God, the grace and peace of His Christ be with all who seek His Will in all things—who walk as Christ has shown how to walk in the Way of Life.
© Orest
Solyma Sept 16, 2000; Edited Dec 2000 Jan 2001
|
Copyright
© 2006, Sound a Trumpet |