(If
you are meeting in a small group, select a leader for the day. The
leader reads
the text printed in regular face. The rest of the group reads the
text printed in
bold face and wherever it states “In Unison.” If you are
worshipping as a single
individual, read all the parts.)
CALL TO WORSHIP
Grace
to you and peace from God our Father and
From the Sovereign Jesus Christ.
God will not forsake or abandon us,
But promises justice to the upright of heart.
God is our stronghold and refuge;
The steadfast love of God upholds us.
Because we have been strengthened by the grace
of God
We are here to offer our sacrifices of praise.
If God had not been our help,
Our souls would have dwelt in silence.
When the cares of our hearts are many
The consolations of God cheer our souls.
INVITATION
(In
Unison)
Although
you are with us every day, God of all worlds, we come together to
know your presence more fully in this special place set aside for
worshiping you. We are here not only to be taught, but also to be
chastened. We are here not only to remember, but also to be renewed.
We are here not only to celebrate our freedom, but also to be strengthened
in the living out of our responsibilities. May our worship be genuine
and our discipleship complete. Amen.
OPENING
HYMN #212
“God Speaks To Us”
John
14
George W. Warren
God speaks to us; by his great pow’r we’re led;
Let not your hearts become disquieted.
You trust in God, believe and trust in Me;
You trust in God, believe and trust in Me.
In God’s vast realm are many offices;
Were it not so I surely would have said;
For I must go, a place for you prepare;
For I must go, a place for you prepare.
And when this place has been prepared for you,
I will return; with me you shall be too;
So that where I am you may also be;
So that where I am you may also be.
OPENING
PRAYER (In Unison)
Immortal,
invisible God over all, we quake before your creative energy, so
far beyond our knowing and evident beyond our willingness to perceive.
We live in your presence, whether or not we acknowledge you, and
we are subject to your rule, whether or not we choose to follow
your way. Meet us in this hour, that we may not mistake our own
prejudices and preferences for your will for us. Through Christ.
Amen.
MOMENTS
OF SILENCE
PERSONAL
PRAYER (In
Silence)
HYMN
#102
“Give Ear Unto My Prayer,
O God”
Psalm
61
Dwight Armstrong
Give ear unto my prayer, O God, from earth’s far end I call;
And lead me to the Rock to rest that higher is than I.
For you have been a shelter and a fort against the foe;
O let me in Your dwelling place abide for ever more.
My God has heard my vows and granted righteous heritage;
The share for those who trust in Him and fear His holy name.
Let God prolong the true king’s life; for ever let him reign!
That He may sit before our God, enthroned in righteousness.
When I was faint I cried to God and he did hear my prayer.
For He has been my dwelling place; a shelter from the foe.
And so will I forever more sing praises to his name!
Sing praises to His Name fore’er, and daily pay my vows.
PRESENTATIONS
BEFORE GOD (Not monetary offerings)
Time
for any in attendance to offer a musical or instrumental piece,
a reading, comments, or anything they would like to present before
God.
If
no one is prepared or if you want more, the link below will open
a full choral anthem for your listening enjoyment.
“The
Shepherd Became a Lamb”
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Time
for groups to make any necessary announcements relating to their
own group.
This
week’s message is another look at the difference between the
Old Testament Passover and the Lord’s Supper. As in the past
two weeks, after reading this presentation, it still remains up
to each individual to determine for themselves the best manner for
them to observe the upcoming Holy Days, and which of the services
provided on this website will best suit their needs. Three different
services are provided in the Spring Holy Day section.
COLLECT
(Preparing for the lesson. In Unison)
Challenge
us again with a word that points us beyond where we are in the direction
you would have us go. Link us together, parents and children of
every generation, in the quest for righteous living. Reveal to us
the depths of love, and teach us truly to love one another. Help
us to reach out to those from whom we can expect no thanks or return
of favors. We ask all in Jesus’ name. Amen.
THE
LESSON
(Use
the lesson provided here, or conduct a study of your own selection.)
A
New Look at Jesus’
“Last Supper”
Have
We Been Neglecting
the Sacred Fellowship Meal?
Many
have confused the “last meal” Jesus Christ had
with His disciples with the “Passover.” This meal
was
definitely not a “Passover” — there was
no way they
could have eaten the Passover lamb at that occasion —
and John plainly says it was “BEFORE the Passover”
(John 13:1). What, then, does this meal represent —
and why did the apostle Paul say, “AS OFTEN AS
YE EAT” this bread (I Cor.11:27)? Have we all been
overlooking something here?
William
F. Dankenbring
In
the first epistle Paul wrote to the Corinthians, he admonished them
about many problems which had come upon the Church, and such matters
as hair length for men and women. Then he broke into another subject,
discussing the church services or assemblies of God’s people.
He wrote: “I praise you not, that ye come together [for religious
worship] not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all,
when ye come together IN THE CHURCH, I hear that there be divisions
[Greek, “schisms”] among you; and I partly believe it.
. . . When ye come together into one place, this is not to eat the
Lord’s supper. For in eating everyone takes before other his
own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What? Have
ye not houses to eat and drink in? or despise ye the church of God,
and shame them that have not [them that are poor]? What shall I say
to you? Shall I praise you in this? I praise you not” (I Cor.11:17-22).
What
is Paul talking about here? He seems to be talking about a regular
Church service, on the Sabbath, when God’s people would come
together for instruction, worship, and fellowship with God and Jesus
Christ, and with one another. He clearly speaks of “coming together
in the church.” But in this very same context, he indicates
that they were participating in some sort of meal, which was not to
be confused with the “Lord’s supper.” Apparently,
each brought his own food to the banquet, and some who were rich had
plenty, and the poor in the congregation had little — and Paul
didn’t want the Corinthians to think this was the right way
to do things. Not at all! This kind of selfishness, he said, was not
at all like “the Lord’s supper.”
A
Much Misunderstood Passage
What
is Paul driving at here?
Let’s
go on: He then refers to Jesus’ last meal with His disciples,
and says:
“For
I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you,
that the Lord Jesus THE SAME NIGHT in which he was betrayed
took BREAD: And when he had given thanks, he BRAKE IT, and
said, Take, eat: This is my body, which is broken for you: THIS
DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME.
“After
the same manner also he took the CUP, WHEN HE HAD
SUPPED, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood:
this do ye, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT, in remembrance of me.
For AS OFTEN AS ye EAT this bread, and drink this cup, ye do
SHEW the Lord’s death till he come” (I Cor.11:23-26).
Let’s
understand one thing very clearly: The final meal Jesus had with His
disciples was NOT THE PASSOVER! The Passover was very plainly not
yet come. John, in describing this final meal Jesus had with His disciples,
said, “Now BEFORE the feast of the Passover” (John 13:1).
He plainly shows this meal or banquet was BEFORE the true Passover,
which was scheduled to be eaten and observed the next night, Nisan
15 (John 18:18). The next day the Jews would still be “preparing”
for the Passover (John 19:14, 31). Therefore, what exactly WAS this
“last meal”?
What
few have realized, not being familiar with Jewish customs of the time
of Jesus, is that this meal could not have been the Passover, since
Passover lambs would not be slain until the following afternoon, and
then eaten in the homes of the Jews on the night of the actual “Passover”
— when God slew the firstborn in the land of Egypt and “passed
over” the Israelites — Nisan 15. Yet obviously, this final
meal was very important — a meal of close fellowship and spiritual
significance.
A
Jewish Look at the Last Supper
Says
David H. Stern, in the Jewish New Testament Commentary:
“The
Last Supper is considered by most scholars to have been a Passover
meal or Seder. Many Pesach themes are deepened, reinforced and
given
new levels of meaning by events in the life of Yeshua the Messiah
and by
his words on this night. However, Joseph Shulam has suggested
that it
may not have been the Seder but a se’udat-mitzvah, the CELEBRATORY
‘BANQUET accompanying performance of a commandment’
such as a wed-
ding or b’ rit-milah.
“Here
is the background for his argument. When a rabbi and his students
finish studying a tractate of the Talmud, they celebrate with
a se’udat-mitzvah
(also called a se’udat-siyum, ‘banquet of completion,’
i.e., graduation). The
Fast of the Firstborn, expressing gratitude for the saving of
Israel’s firstborn
sons from the tenth plague, has been prescribed for the day before
Pesach,
Nisan 14, at least since Mishnaic times. When it is necessary
to eat a se’udat-
mitzvah, this takes precedence over a fast. With a modicum of
foresight a
rabbi can plan to complete a tractate on Nisan 14 and thus avoid
having to fast;
doing so is not construed as cheating, and in fact it has become
the custom.
“The
tradition of the Fast of the Firstborn dates at least from Mishnaic
times.
But, Shulam reasons, if it goes back a couple of centuries more
to the time of
Yeshua, and if the si’udat siyum custom applied in the first
century to the
completing of any course of study, then Yeshua might have arranged
to have
himself and his talmidim [students, disciples] finish reading
a book of the
Tanakh on Nisan 14. Or, since Yeshua knew he was going to die,
he may have
regarded it as appropriate to complete his disciples’ earthly
‘course of study’
with a BANQUET. This solution would also resolve the perceived
conflict
between Yochanan [John] and the Synoptic Gospels over the timing
of the Last
Supper” JNT, p.77).
In
other words, there is much more to this passage in I Corinthians 11,
and its meaning, than we have supposed. Although there is no doubt
that Jesus Christ presented the new meanings of the bread and the
wine as representing His broken body and shed blood, given on our
behalf, at the last supper, and that these symbols are directly involved
in the Passover Seder, held on Nisan 15, it is also a fact
that this final meal was ONE DAY before the Passover. It is also a
fact that Jesus did not tell His disciples that they should institute
a NEW COMMANDMENT, or a new “holy day,” and begin observing
Nisan 14, at the eve, as a memorial of this “last supper.”
However, He was having a “final banquet” with them —
a special and unique “fellowship meal” with them, where
all were relaxed, reclining, at ease, and experiencing a very close
oneness with each other. This was similar to a Passover Seder in some
respects — but yet different.
The
Greek Word “Artos”
Interestingly,
when Jesus held this final dinner with His disciples, the word John
used to describe it was diepnon, which means “supper,
the principal meal, dinner.” It is used of the last supper Jesus
held with His disciples, and other main meals of the day (see Mark
6:21; Luke 14:12, 16, 17, 24; 22:20; John 12:2; 13:21, 4; I Cor.11:20-21;
Rev.19:9, 17). This word is NEVER used of an annual Festival, or of
the Passover. However, it simply refers to the MAIN MEAL of the day,
usually at evening.
Furthermore,
at this final dinner or banquet, there is no mention of lamb being
eaten — which would have been necessary if this were the Passover.
The gospel accounts would hardly have neglected to mention such an
important feature.
But
even more interesting is the fact that Jewish custom of that time,
and always, has dictated that UNLEAVENED BREAD was not to be eaten
during the days before the FEAST of Unleavened Bread, so that the
Feast would be set apart as distinct and real. For unleavened bread
to have been eaten BEFORE the Festival would have diminished its importance
during the Feast itself! Therefore, if Jesus and His disciples had
eaten “unleavened bread” on the night of Nisan 14, they
would have violated Jewish custom and practice. It is very interesting,
therefore, to notice that when Jesus sat down at dinner, at that final
meal with His disciples, “as they were eating, Jesus took bread,
and blessed it [many Greek copies have, “gave thanks”],
and brake it, and gave to the disciples, and said, Take, eat; this
is my body” (Matt.26:26). The word for “bread” here
is artos, and means, “bread (as raised), a loaf.”
This same word is used in Matthew 4:3-4, “man does not live
by bread alone,” in Matthew 6:11, “our daily bread,”
and Matthew 16:12, “the leaven of bread,” etc. This word
is often used of LEAVENED BREAD!
Generally,
whenever UNLEAVENED bread is meant, this word is preceded by the Greek
word for “unleavened,” which is azumos, meaning
“unleavened, uncorrupted.” But in the three synoptic gospel
accounts of the last supper of Jesus and His disciples, Matthew 26:26,
Mark 14:22, Luke 22:19, the writers always use ONLY THE WORD ARTOS,
meaning BREAD — without the modifying word azumos to
designate “unleavened.” Therefore, the clear indication
is that AT THE LAST SUPPER JESUS USED NORMAL LEAVENED BREAD, when
He blessed and broke it, and said, “Take, eat; this is my body”!
Here
is further proof that this dinner was not and could not have been
the PASSOVER!
The
Real Bread at the “Last Supper”
Further
proof that Jesus and His disciples did NOT and could not have eaten
the “Passover,” with its unleavened bread, at the “last
supper” on the eve or beginning of Nisan 14, is plain and simple
Jewish law (halakha) of the time. It is a historical fact that when
the Scriptures use the expression “kept the Passover”
(Ezra 6:19) it refers strictly to the slaying of the Passover lamb,
on the 14th of Nisan, whereas the expression “eat the Passover”
was fulfilled the coming evening of Nisan 15 which was the beginning
of the eating of unleavened bread on “the night to be much observed.”
The reason why this evening was called “the night to
be much observed” was because the Passover meal was always eaten
as the first meal in the Feast of Unleavened Bread.
Also,
according to Jewish law of the times (halakha), it was absolutely
forbidden to eat unleavened bread during the 24-hour period prior
to the first night of Unleavened Bread! This was a distinction made
by law to sanctify (set apart) the sacred meaning of the Feast from
whatever they may have eaten for bread on the previous days. This
means that Jesus and the disciples could not have eaten unleavened
bread the evening prior to the “night to be much observed”!
Also,
the gospels indicate that Jesus was keeping the Fast of the Firstborn
during the daylight hours of the crucifixion day — this was
a daytime fast observed by all firstborn Jews on the Preparation Day
in remembrance of God protecting the firstborn of Israel while killing
the firstborn of Egypt; this also explains Jesus’ remark in
Matthew 26:29, “I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of
the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s
kingdom.” Obviously, Jesus did not drink any wine the following
day. Furthermore, this explains why He refused to accept the vinegar
mixed with gall mentioned in Matthew 27:34. The Hebrew text of Matthew’s
gospel written by the Spanish Jewish scholar Shem-Tov ben-Shaprut
(c.1380 A.D.) reads: “and gave him wine mixed with gall. But
when he began to drink it he perceived and would not drink it.”
Jesus must have remembered He was observing the Fast of the Firstborn.
The Greek word for “taste” used in this verse produced
a false impression. Jesus remembered before He drank and swallowed.
Clearly,
then, the “bread” which Jesus broke and gave to His disciples
during the beginning portion of Nisan 14, in the evening, at His final
“supper” with them, must have been and indeed was
LEAVENED BREAD!
But
can this be? Can leavened bread, as well as unleavened bread, represent
the body of Jesus Christ?
The
answer is a resounding YES!
In
Leviticus 23:17, regarding the feast of Pentecost, we read: “Ye
shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals:
they shall be of fine flour; they shall be BAKEN WITH LEAVEN;
they are the firstfruits unto the LORD.” Leaven, in
this case, certainly does not represent SIN, as nothing “contaminated”
or “sinful” could ever be offered to God. To offer “sins”
to God would be sacrilegious — blasphemy — like offering
swine’s flesh (Isa.66:3, 17).
Notice,
therefore, what the Jamieson, Faussett and Brown Commentary
has to say on this passage in Leviticus 23:
“These
loaves were made of “fine” or wheaten flour, the quantity
contained in them being somewhat more than ten pounds weight.
As the wave-sheaf gave the signal for the commencement, the two
loaves solemnized the termination of the harvest season. They
were
the first-fruits of that season, being offered unto the Lord by
the priest
in name of the whole nation (see on Exo.34:22). The loaves used
at
the Passover were UNLEAVENED, those presented at Pentecost were
LEAVENED — a difference which is thus accounted for, —
that the
one was a memorial of the bread hastily prepared at their departure,
while the other was a TRIBUTE OF GRATITUDE TO GOD for their
daily food, which was leavened . . .” (vol. 1, p.498).
However,
even “leavened bread” is a TYPE of the body of Christ,
and represents “His flesh” which He gave for the sins
of the world. To the Jews, unleavened or flat bread represented affliction
and poverty, as when the Israelites came out of Egypt; but leavened
loaves of bread, as were sacrificed at Pentecost to the Lord (Leviticus
23:17), typify ABUNDANCE, richness, wealth. The typology should be
clear. Christ crucified was in affliction, flatness, abject, beaten,
bruised, pierced, pummeled — the perfect type being unleavened
bread. Christ as the richness of the abundance of life, life-giving
bread, is pictured by the loaves of beautiful, sweet-smelling leavened
bread! Don’t all of us enjoy a beautiful loaf of home-made leavened
whole wheat bread straight out of the oven steaming? Therefore, the
richness of leavened bread also symbolizes Jesus Christ, the “bread
of life.” Notice!
“The
BREAD of Life”
In
John chapter 6, when Jesus fed the multitude from a few loaves of
bread and a few fishes, He declared,
“For
the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven,
and giveth life unto the world. . . . I AM THE BREAD OF
LIFE: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that
believeth on me shall never thirst. . . .
“I
am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the wilder-
ness, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from
heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
“I
am the LIVING BREAD which came down from heaven:
if any man eat of THIS BREAD, he shall live forever: and the
bread which I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the
life of the world. . . .
“Verily,
verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son
of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth
my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will
raise
him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood
is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood,
dwelleth in me, and I in him As the living Father hath sent me,
and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall
live
by me.
“This
is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your
fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread
shall live forever” (John 6:33-58).
Jesus,
then, is the “bread of life.” This is a reality. This
is not just Passover. Throughout the year, every day, day in and day
out, Jesus Christ remains and IS the “bread of life” which
came down from heaven! We should be eating of this “bread”
DAILY as we study the Scriptures! Jesus went on to declare:
“It
is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing. The
words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life”
(John 6:63).
Thus
even regular bread is a type of the richness of the life-giving bread
of Jesus Christ! In this sense, the leaven represents fullness and
abundance. True Christians, as members of the body of Christ, also
are “one bread” IN Christ!
“We . . . Are One Bread”
Now
notice I Corinthians 10. Paul discusses this same subject of the wine
and bread again — but not necessarily in a Passover context.
Notice!
“I
speak as to wise men; judge ye what I say. The CUP OF
BLESSING, which we bless, is it not the communion of the
blood of Christ? The BREAD WHICH WE BREAK, is it
not the communion of the body of Christ? FOR WE BEING
MANY ARE ONE BREAD, AND ONE BODY: for we are
all partakers of that one bread. . . . Ye cannot drink the cup
of the Lord, and the cup of demons: ye cannot be partakers
of the Lord’s table, and of the table of demons. Do we provoke
the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?” (I Cor.10:15-22).
It
is obvious that during Passover, on Nisan 15, we partake of the unleavened
bread, the matzos, representing the body of Christ, as well as the
cup of blessing, the wine, representing His shed blood as our Passover
lamb (I Cor.5:7). But in the book of First Corinthians, Paul seems
to be discussing NOT THE PASSOVER but something altogether different!
Notice!
If he were discussing the Passover, why doesn’t he call
it “Passover”?
Secondly,
why does he connect this meal, with bread and wine, with regular
church services, “when ye come together IN THE CHURCH”?
(I Cor.11:18)?
Thirdly,
WHY if this were the Passover does Paul say, as to the TIME
ELEMENT when we partake of this special meal, “AS OFTEN
AS YE EAT THIS BREAD” (verse 26)? The phrase “AS OFT”
or “AS OFTEN” would seem to indicate not an anniversary
event, but an INDEFINITE TIME PERIOD OF UNKNOWN OR VARYING DURATION.
For years I have puzzled why Paul used the expression “as oft
as” and “as often as” in regard to this ceremony
or meal. Herbert Armstrong never explained it. He simply overrode
it, and said the key to “how often” we observe it is the
fact that the Passover is an ANNUAL event! But the apostle Paul does
not call this the PASSOVER at all! People have simply ASSUMED
it was the Passover!
The Jamieson, Faussett, Brown Commentary
Many
have assumed in the past that Jesus’ last supper was
the Passover. Therefore, they have concluded that I Corinthians 11
also must refer to the Passover. However, neither assumption is true.
Since we now know that Jesus last supper with His disciples was actually
ONE WHOLE DAY BEFORE the true Passover, it had to be a sacred meal
of fellowship. This sheds new light on Paul’s real meaning and
subject of discussion in I Corinthians 11. Let us notice this chapter
carefully, going through it with the Jamieson, Faussett and Brown
Critical, Experimental and Practical Commentary.
Verse
20. “When ye come together in one place, this is not to eat
the Lord’s supper.” Says the commentary:
“It
is not possible to eat a true Lord’s supper where UNITY
exists not
(ch.X.17); where each is greedily intent on ‘HIS OWN SUPPER,’
and
some are excluded altogether, not having been waited for (v.33;
where
some are ‘drunken,’ others ‘hungry’ (v.21).
The LOVE-FEAST
preceded the Lord’s supper . . . They ate and drank together
earthly,
then heavenly food, in token of their unity for time and eternity.
It
was a CLUB-FEAST, where each brought his portion, and the rich
extra portions for the poor. From it the bread and wine were taken
for the Eucharist. It was at it that the excesses took place which
made
a true celebration of the Lord’s supper, during or after
it, with due
discernment of its solemnity, out of the question . . .”
Paul
here, then, is rebuking the Corinthians for their IMPROPER OBSERVANCE
of the sacred fellowship meal, patterned after Jesus’ last supper
with His disciples. This was a “love feast” of the brethren,
where members of the church ate together:
“23.
He shows the unworthiness of such conduct from the dignity
of the holy supper. I — emphatic in the Greek. It is not
my own,
but the Lord’s institution. received of
the Lord — by immediate
revelation from the risen Saviour (Gal.1:12; cf. Acts 22:17, 18;
II
Cor.12:1-4). . . . The renewal of the institution, by special
revela-
tion to St. Paul, enhances its solemnity. . . . the time for
the Lord’s
supper is not fixed. betrayed. With the
traitor at the table, and though
about to receive such injury from man, He gave this LAST GIFT,
a
pledge of his amazing love to man. 24. brake.
The breaking of the
bread involves its distribution . . . . as oft
as — as many times soever;
FOR IT IS AN ORDINANCE OFTEN TO BE PARTAKEN OF.
in remembrance of me . . . The Lord’s supper
brings to our remem-
brance Christ’s sacrifice once for all for the full
and final remission
of sins. Not ‘do this for a memorial of me,’
as if it were a memorial
sacrifice, which would be mnemosunon (Acts 10:4)
or hupomnesin,
— a reminding the Father of His Son’s sacrifice. Nay,
it is for OUR
REMEMBRANCE OF IT, not to remind Him. 26. For
— in proof
that the Lord’s supper is ‘in remembrance’ of
Him. show — announce
publicly; not dramatically represent, but publicly
profess each of you,
the Lord died FOR ME’ . . .
“AS
OFT AS YE EAT IT . . .”
Notice!
This sacred meal and service is NOT AN ANNUAL MEMORIAL AT ALL —
it is to be partaken of “AS MANY TIMES SOEVER,” or ‘OFTEN.”
This could even mean as often as weekly, when possible. In Jewish
synagogues, following the synagogue service the congregation often
met together for a fellowship meal. Paul does not “set a time”
for this wonderful fellowship meal, patterned after the Lord’s
final meal with His disciples — this LOVE-FEAST. But he does
say, “as OFT as ye do it.” The implication is that this
holy meal of fellowship, including the symbols of bread and wine representing
Christ’s body and blood given for us, should be enjoyed OFTEN!
This
same expression in the Greek, “as oft as,” is found in
Revelation 11:6, speaking of the two witnesses who in the future will
smite the earth with plagues “as often as they will.”
Thus Paul is not talking about the Passover here at all, but to a
sacred fellowship meal held often, but not on an annual or “scheduled”
basis such as an annual Festival! Let us continue:
“That
the Lord’s supper is in remembrance of Him, implies
that He is
bodily absent, though spiritually present; for we cannot ‘commemorate’
one
absent. Our not only showing the Lord’s death,
but eating and
drinking the pledges of it, could only be understood
BY THE JEWS,
ACCUSTOMED TO FEASTS after propitiatory sacrifices, as implying
our personal appropriation of the benefits of that death.
till he come —
when there shall be no longer need of symbols, the body itself
being
manifested. The Greek . . . expresses the certainty of
His coming . . .”
(p.316-317, Critical-Experimental Commentary ).
How
cleverly Satan has deceived so many. Paul is not talking about the
Passover at all in this passage. He discusses the Passover in I Corinthians
5:7-8, very plainly, showing that we should also observe that Feast.
It is kept as a vigil and “Seder” on the night of Nisan
15, as it has been observed by the faithful ever since the time of
Moses. But in I Corinthians 11, Paul is discussing another subject
altogether — the sacred fellowship meal patterned after the
final supper Jesus Christ held with His disciples! And this wonderful
spiritual “banquet” is NOT an annual anniversary at all,
but is to be held “OFTEN”!
What
a wonderful, marvelous new TRUTH!
The
Sacred Fellowship Meal
Now
notice something else. After His resurrection, Jesus in disguise appeared
to two of His disciples as they were walking to the village of Emmaus.
As they walked and talked, Jesus expounded to them the words of the
prophets concerning Himself. They were so interested in His words,
that they constrained Him to abide with them that night. We read:
“And
it came to pass, as he SAT AT MEAT with them, HE TOOK
BREAD, AND BLESSED IT, AND BRAKE, and GAVE to them.
And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished
out
of their sight” (Luke 24:13-31).
This
was not the Passover. It was a simple meal of fellowship. But notice
the symbolism! Jesus took bread, which is a symbol of His flesh, and
blessed it, and GAVE it to them — and suddenly their eyes were
OPENED and they
knew who He was!
Now
notice another related event. After Jesus ascended to heaven, and
God began the New Testament Church by pouring out His Holy Spirit
upon the disciples on the day of Pentecost, Sivan 6, in 41 A.D., Peter
preached a powerful sermon at the Temple, and three thousand people
were converted and baptized on that one day (Acts 2:1-40, 41).
Now
notice! What did these NEW DISCIPLES do? What was the most important
thing they did, together, that was SO IMPORTANT that it was specifically
written down in Scripture for our admonition and EXAMPLE? Notice
carefully! We read immediately in the very next few verses of Acts
2:
“And
they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine AND
FELLOWSHIP, AND IN BREAKING OF BREAD, and in prayers . . .
.
“And
all that believed were together, and had all things common;
and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men,
as every man had need. And they, continuing DAILY IN THE
TEMPLE, AND BREAKING BREAD FROM HOUSE TO
HOUSE, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of
heart, praising God and having favor with all the people”
(Acts 2:42-47).
NOTICE!
IT WAS A CUSTOM OF THE EARLY CHURCH TO “BREAK BREAD” TOGETHER,
IN FELLOWSHIP, PRAISING GOD! This was so important that it was
recorded in the book of Acts.
Why?
The answer should be obvious — FOR OUR INSTRUCTION and admonition,
SHOWING US that we should be doing the VERY SAME THING —
TODAY!
Paul’s
Inspired EXAMPLE
This
is verified further in Acts 20, verse 7, a verse generally neglected
and glossed over. Notice!
“And
upon the first day of the week, WHEN THE DISCIPLES
CAME TOGETHER TO BREAK BREAD, Paul preached unto
them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech
until midnight” (Acts 20:7).
What
do we see here? The disciples are having a FELLOWSHIP MEAL, most likely
shortly before sunset, on the Sabbath, following an afternoon Sabbath
service. They are together for a SUPPER or DINNER, with fellowship,
and that is followed by a message given by the apostle Paul as a “going
away” message, Paul knowing he was going to Jerusalem, and not
knowing what might befall him there.
Remember,
Paul also wrote to the Corinthian brethren, “Be ye followers
of me, even as I also am of CHRIST” (I Cor.11:1). These things
were written in the book of Acts, and discussed in First Corinthians,
to give us an EXAMPLE TO FOLLOW! We also, today, should be having
sacred fellowship meals!
Again,
when Paul was on board a ship which suffered in a heavy storm, when
the storm passed, he spoke to the sailors:
“And
while the day was coming on, Paul besought them all to
take meat, saying, This day is the fourteenth day that ye have
tarried and continued fasting, having taken nothing. Wherefore
I pray you to take some meat: for this is for your health: for
there shall not an hair fall from any of you. And when he had
thus spoken, HE TOOK BREAD, and gave thanks to God in
the
presence of them all: and when he had broken it, he began to eat.
Then were they all of good cheer, and they also took some meat.
And we were in all in the ship two hundred threescore and sixteen
souls. And when they had eaten enough, they lightened the ship,
and cast out the wheat into the sea” (Acts 27:33-38).
Here
again we see Paul taking bread, breaking it, and giving thanks, preparatory
of a meal of fellowship.
However,
in this case, Paul had a special meal with the whole company of a
ship, since all of them had weathered a severe storm at sea together,
and were survivors together. They all had something in common. This
meal was an encouragement to everybody — even the unconverted
sailors!
A
Very Important Lesson for US!
What are these Scriptures telling us? As a matter of fact, these Scriptures
are highlighting something that has been SERIOUSLY NEGLECTED in ALL
the end-time Remnant Churches of God — including Worldwide Church
of God, Church of God, International, and others.
NONE
of the remnants of the Church of God, in our generation, have the
CUSTOM or PRACTICE OF HOLDING A SACRED FELLOWSHIP MEAL, at which bread
— a symbol of the body of Christ — and wine — a
symbol of His shed blood — is partaken of, along with a REGULAR
MEAL! In New Testament times, the “breaking of bread”
was a term which referred to having a meal or dinner together! The
disciples of the Lord, as we have seen, broke bread together OFTEN!
There was no “set time,” necessarily — but they
did it OFTEN!
This
was the kind of meal that Jesus Christ had with His disciples on the
EVE of His crucifixion! This was the kind of meal the EARLY CHURCH
held, often, in fellowship with each other, in Christ!
And
this was the very meal the apostle Paul was describing in I Corinthians,
chapter 11 — a sacred fellowship meal!
Therefore,
the statements given in I Corinthians 11 by Paul, looking back to
the last “supper” or fellowship meal Jesus Christ held
with His disciples before His death, do not refer directly or
only to the Passover at all. In principle, of course, these statements
do refer to the PORTION of the Passover which involves the eating
of bread, symbolizing the body of Christ, and the drinking of wine,
which connotes the blood of Christ. Nor do these statements by
Paul refer to any “new” memorial annual celebration to
be held on Nisan 14, on the eve of Christ’s death!
But
these statements, in PRINCIPLE, do refer to something else?
What is that?
The
Sacred Fellowship Meal
Simply
this — these statements refer directly to a FELLOWSHIP MEAL
which should have been shared, as a sort of group dinner, with each
contributing as he was able, to the common meal, which was held “WHEN
THEY CAME TOGETHER IN THE CHURCH” (I Cor.11:18) —
A MEAL WHICH WOULD OFTEN BE HELD RIGHT AFTER CHURCH SERVICES
WERE FINISHED!
Isn’t
it about time we took these Scriptures literally? Isn’t it about
time we quit arguing over Passover versus Nisan 14, and understood
these Scriptures to be referring to something done “AS OFTEN
AS YE EAT THIS BREAD,” or as often as they held a sacred fellowship
meal in the Church? The phrase, “as often as,” proves
that this meal was held at an INDEFINITE TIME — not a regular
weekly, monthly, or annual event — not a yearly “memorial”
at all — but “AS OFTEN AS” they were able, conditions
permitting, to do it!
The
Ancient “Love Feasts” of the Church!
In
his second epistle, the apostle Peter warns us about false brethren
who come to these “love feasts.” He declared of them,
“But these as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed,
speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly
perish in their own corruption; and shall receive the reward of unrighteousness,
as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots
they are, and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings
WHILE THEY FEAST WITH YOU . . .” (II Pet.2:12-13).
Adam
Clarke says of this passage: “It appears they held a kind of
communion with the Church, and attended sacred festivals, which they
desecrated with their own unhallowed opinions and conduct.”
The Jamieson, Faussett, Brown Commentary states: “Whilst
partaking of the LOVE-FEAST with you, they are ‘luxuriating
in their own deceivings’ or ‘deceits’.”
The
apostle Jude speaks of this same kind of problem which inevitably
arises when carnal, wicked impostors and false brethren come in to
partake of the sacred fellowship meals. He wrote:
“These
are SPOTS in your FEASTS OF CHARITY [LOVE],
when they FEAST with you, feeding themselves without
fear:
clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees
whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by
the roots; raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame;
wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness
for ever” (Jude 12-13).
Says
Adam Clarke in his Commentary of the “feasts of charity”
described in this passage:
“The
feasts of charity, or LOVE FEASTS, of which the apostle
speaks, WERE IN USE IN THE PRIMITIVE CHURCH UNTIL
THE FOURTH CENTURY, WHEN, BY THE COUNCIL OF
LAODICEA, THEY WERE PROHIBITED TO BE HELD IN
THE CHURCHES; AND, HAVING BEEN
ABUSED, FELL
INTO DISUSE.”
Did
you GET THAT?
These
original “love feasts” or sacred fellowship meals, held
OFTEN by the early Church, and patterned after the Lord’s final
supper with His disciples, WERE THE CUSTOM OF THE TRUE CHURCH —
and as such they were ABOLISHED, FORBIDDEN AND PROHIBITED
BY THE PAGAN ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AT THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA!!!
Adam
Clarke goes on:
“Among
the ancients, the richer members of the Church made an
occasional general feast, at which all the members attended, and
the poor and the rich ate together. The fatherless, the
widows, and
the strangers were invited to these feasts, and their EATING TO-
GETHER was a proof of their love to each other; whence such
entertainments were called love feasts. The love feasts
were at
first celebrated before the Lord’s Supper [that
is, before the emblems
of the bread and wine symbolizing the body and blood of Christ
were
taken] . . .”
These
ancient feasts were patterned after the last supper or “love
feast” which Jesus had with His disciples. At the end of the
meal, as at the “last supper,” the emblems of bread and
wine are taken, symbolizing the broken body and shed blood of our
Saviour, keeping all in remembrance of the great price He paid on
our behalf, and keeping us in an attitude of reverence and spiritual
awe, even when fellowshipping and feasting together.
In
process of time, however, even these wonderful sacred fellowship meals
became a problem due to infiltrators and false brethren who sought
to pervert them and use them to exalt their own authority. Rather
than a true fellowship meal, with ministers and lay members all eating
and fellowshipping together, at the same tables, as Christ
did with His disciples, although He was over them in authority, like
one big joyous family, these false deceivers sought to exalt themselves.
The
Jamieson, Faussett and Brown Commentary points out this tragic
fact:
“spots.
So II Pet.2:13 [spiloi; here, spilades, which,
in secular
writers, means rocks, viz., on which the Christian love-feasts
were in danger of shipwreck]. A B C read emphatically ‘THE
rocks.’ The reference to ‘clouds . . . winds . . .
waves,’ accords
with rocks. . . . The love-feasts accompanied the Lord’s
Supper
(I Cor.11, end). Korah the Levite, not satisfied with his ministry,
aspired to the sacrificing priesthood also: so ministers
in the
Lord’s Supper, seeking to make it a sacrifice,
and themselves
sacrificing priests, usurp the function of our only Christian
sacerdotal Priest, Christ Jesus. Let them beware of Korah’s
doom!
feeding themselves [poimainontes ] —
‘pasturing themselves.’ What
they look to is tending themselves, not the flock: they
are ‘pastors,’
but it is to ‘themselves.’ without fear.
Join, not as the English
version, but with ‘feast.’ Sacred feasts especially
ought to be
celebrated with fear. Feasting is not faulty in itself
(Bengel ),
but needs to be accompanied with fear of forgetting God,
as Job
(ch.1:5) in his sons’ feasts. clouds —
from which one would expect
refreshing rain; but ‘without water’ (II Pet.2:17):
professors without
practice. carried about. . . ‘carried aside;’
i.e., out of the right course
trees whose fruit withereth [phthinoporina
] ‘trees of the late (waning )
autumn,’ viz., when there are no longer leaves or fruits
on the trees . . .
without fruit — without good fruit
of knowledge and practice; sometimes
what is positively bad. twice dead —
first, when they cast their leaves in
autumn, and seem during winter dead, but revive again
in spring; second-
ly, when they are ‘plucked up by the roots.’ SO THESE
APOSTATES,
once dead in unbelief, then, in respect to profession, raised
from the
death of sin to the life of righteousness, but NOW HAVING BECOME
DEAD AGAIN BY APOSTASY, so hopelessly dead
. . . .”
This
is a very powerful, thought-provoking, knowledge-crammed passage,
deserving to be read and studied very carefully. Clearly, the early
Church, which followed most closely the TRUTH teachings of Jesus Christ,
held from time to time a “LOVE-FEAST,” or “sacred
fellowship banquet” or dinner. Each member contributed as he
was able. Those who could afford nothing, however, brought themselves,
as the dinner was for ALL the Church! Ministers and members, all members
being a “spiritual house,” a “holy priesthood,”
“lively stones,” fellowshipping TOGETHER, on an equal
plane! In the original TRUE Church, ministers were NOT exalted
“above” the brethren. True ministers are not “as
being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples
to the flock” (I Pet.5:3).
There
was no division or “separation” between ministers and
lay members at these true “love-feasts.” It was a true
FAMILY SETTING — as the Church of God IS the “FAMILY”
of God (Eph.3:15).
Jesse
Lyman Hurlbut, in The Story of the Christian Church, describes
how these corrupters and self-seeking individuals crept into the church
and began to pervert and change that which was holy and good, and
changed it into an ungodly, pagan, heathenish masquerade.
Notice
his stinging indictment of the spiritually sinking ministry of that
time!
“Many
privileges were bestowed upon the clergy, not all by imperial
enactment, but by custom which soon became law. Public duties
obligatory upon all citizens were no longer required of the clergy;
they were set free from taxes [in some churches today, tithes!];
all
accusations against clergymen were tried before ecclesiastical
courts
[i.e., by ministerial cohorts, in private — of course!].
The MINISTERS
OF THE CHURCH SOON BECAME A PRIVILEGED CLASS,
ABOVE THE LAW OF THE LAND” (p.76).
This,
of course, became a great CURSE to the Church, by now far removed
from the pure, primitive, sacred TRUTH of God! Says Hurlbut, further:
“Everybody
sought membership in the church, and nearly everybody
was received. Both good and bad, sincere seekers after God and
hypo-
critical seekers after gain, rushed into the communion. Ambitious,
worldly, unscrupulous men sought office in the church for
social and
political influence. The moral tone of Christianity was FAR BELOW
that which had marked the same people under persecution.
“The
services of worship increased in splendor, but were LESS
SPIRITUAL AND HEARTY than those of former times. The forms
and ceremonies of PAGANISM gradually crept into the worship.
Some
of the old HEATHEN FEASTS BECAME CHURCH FESTIVALS
WITH CHANGE OF NAME AND WORSHIP. About 405 A.D. images
of saints and martyrs began to appear in the churches, at
first as memorials,
then in succession revered, adored, and worshipped. The adoration
of the
Virgin Mary was substituted for the worship of Venus and Diana;
the
LORD’S SUPPER BECAME A SACRIFICE in place of a
memorial;
and the ELDER EVOLVED from a preacher into a priest”
(p.79).
Do
you see what happened? When the simple fellowship and sacred fellowship
meal became perverted, and ministers began to EXALT THEMSELVES, they
quickly led the church into PAGANISM! The truth of God became buried
under an avalanche of RELIGIOUS totalitarian authority, supposedly
from God, but actually a masquerade of Devil (see II Cor.11:13-15).
In the process, the wonderful “love-feasts” of the first
century Church of God became defiled, polluted, and perverted into
the PAGAN MASS — called “the Lord’s Supper”!
But what a travesty? The priests, or “ministers,” blessed
the wine and bread, and doled it out to the members, and DID AWAY
WITH THE “SUPPER” in the ‘Lord’s Supper”!
Thus they turned a joyous supper into a priestly sacrifice!
Just
as in the days of the arch-rebel Korah in the time of Moses, these
ministers aren’t satisfied with being preachers of the gospel
— they want to be OFFICIATING PRIESTS ALSO!
Today,
a number of Churches, both Protestant and Catholic, and even the Worldwide
Church of God and its several splinter churches, all observe what
they often confuse with the “Passover” but also call “the
Lord’s Supper,” at which they partake of the emblems of
bread and wine blessed by the local priest or highest ranking minister.
What originally began by Christ and the apostles as a joyous LOVE-FEAST
they transformed and turned into a religious ritual!
How
sad! How tragic!
The
apostasy grew and spread, and matters became so bad, according to
historian Jesse Lyman Hurbut, that
“The
humility and saintliness of an earlier age was succeeded by
ambition, pride, and arrogance, among CHURCHMEN. . . . the
tide of worldliness swept uncontrolled over many professed
disciples of their lowly Lord.
“.
. . the church and the state became one. . . In the east the state
dominated the church until it lost all energy and uplifting life.
In
the west . . . the church gradually usurped power over the state,
and the result was not Christianity but a more or less
corrupt
HIERARCHY controlling the nations of Europe, making the
church mainly a political machine” (p.80).
As
apostasy spread and poisoned the minds of church members, the church
itself became more and more a “POLITICAL MACHINE,” instead
of the lowly, saintly, humble and pure virgin bride of Christ! The
faith of many had become shipwrecked. What many still thought was
the “bride of Christ” became instead the WHORE OF BABYLON!
(see Rev.17:1-7; 18:1-9).
Isn’t it about time we REALLY get back to the “faith once
delivered to the saints”? As the apostle Jude wrote, who himself
mentioned the original “feasts of charity” or “love
feasts,”
“Beloved,
when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common
salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, that ye should
EARNESTLY CONTEND FOR THE FAITH WHICH WAS ONCE
DELIVERED UNTO THE SAINTS. For there are certain men crept
in unawares . . .” (Jude 3-4).
Wonderful
TRUTH RESTORED!
Thus
the passage in I Corinthians 11 certainly does not prove, as some
claim, that Passover was changed to the beginning of Nisan 14. Although
the principles Paul stated here can refer to the wine and bread elements
of the true Passover, held annually on Nisan 15, Paul is actually
discussing here the SACRED FELLOWSHIP DINNER, which was held “as
OFT” as they were able to do so, to have a meal together as
a Church and fellowship together, remembering on this occasion
and partaking of the “bread” symbolizing Christ’s
body, and the “wine,” symbolizing His blood — as
a special observance associated with the “sacred fellowship
meal.” This is much more than just having a “dinner”
together! It focuses our minds, when we have such an observance, ON
CHRIST, the one who makes our fellowship together IN HIM possible!
Let’s
thank God for this new truth! Let’s thank Him for this NEW UNDERSTANDING
which gives us NEW INSIGHT into the importance of “breaking
bread” together, as God’s people, and FELLOWSHIPPING with
a sacred FELLOWSHIP MEAL! We should strive to have a fellowship meal
with brethren often. As Malachi and the apostle Paul write:
“Then
they feared the LORD spake often one to another: and the LORD
hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written
before
him for them that feared the LORD, and that thought upon his name.
And
they shall be mine, saith the LORD of hosts, in that day when
I make up
MY JEWELS, and I WILL SPARE THEM, as a man spareth his own
son
that serveth him. Then shall ye return, and discern between
the righteous
and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth
him
not” (Malachi 4:16-18).
The
apostle Paul added:
“And
let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works:
NOT FORSAKING THE ASSEMBLING OF OURSELVES TOGETHER,
as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so
much the more,
as ye see the day approaching” (Hebrews 10:24-25).
And
in another place, he admonished:
“But
exhort one another DAILY, while it is called Today; lest any of
you
be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. For we are made
partakers of
Christ, IF we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto
the end”
(Hebrews 3:13-14).
As
we head into the very last days, the time of Satan the devil’s
“Last Stand,” and horrifying times of persecution and
affliction and great tribulation, let us draw near to God and to Jesus
Christ our Lord and Saviour, and let us take to heart His admonition
and example of fellowship and breaking bread together, with thanksgiving
and praise to God.
And
let us CELEBRATE God’s sacred fellowship “LOVE FEASTS”
— as Jesus Christ Himself set us the example at His “last
supper” with His disciples — and let us do so in the bond
of true Christian fellowship, peace, unity and love!
See
Original
The original also contains a section called “Celebrating the
‘Kiddush’ ”
CLOSING
HYMN #39
“Wonderful Words of Life”
P.P.
Bliss, 19th cent.
Sing them over again to me. Wonderful words of Life;
Let me more of their beauty see. Wonderful words of Life.
Words of life and beauty teach me faith and duty;
Beautiful words, wonderful words, Wonderful words of Life.
Beautiful words, wonderful words, Wonderful words of Life.
Christ, the blessed One, gives to all Wonderful words of Life;
Sinner, list to the loving call; Wonderful words of Life.
All so freely given, Given without leaven;
Beautiful words, wonderful words, Wonderful words of Life.
Beautiful words, wonderful words, Wonderful words of Life.
Sweetly echo the gospel call. Wonderful words of Life;
Offer pardon and peace to all. Wonderful words of Life.
Jesus only Savior, Sanctify for ever.
Beautiful words, wonderful words, Wonderful words of Life.
Beautiful words, wonderful words, Wonderful words of Life.
CLOSING
WORDS (In Unison)
The
God of peace go with you into the world,
Equipping you for the work God calls you to do.
Listen for the will of God and dare to follow it,
That God may be praised in the good you do,
Grace to you and peace from God our Father,
And from the Soverign Jesus Christ.
Amen.